M-Lab versus Down at a Glance

We compared M-Lab ★★★★★ with Down at a Glance ★★★★★ and concluded that Down at a Glance is a better speed test than M-Lab.

This is mainly because the high accuracy, data efficiency, and speed make Down at a Glance a better speed test than M-Lab.

A radar chart comparing M-Lab with Down at a Glance on the aspects of accuracy, data usage, speed, security, privacy, usability, accessibility and informativeness

The radar chart above is based on the results of our standardized speed test test. The results speak for themselves.

Strengths of M-Lab

M-Lab is one of the few speed tests with an accuracy score of 100 (out of 100).

It's good to know that compared to most other speed tests, M-Lab scores quite well and fairly evenly on the different aspects we tested.

M-Lab scores high on the overall score list due to its high accuracy and thoroughness.

Strengths of Down at a Glance

Down at a Glance is accurate, data efficient, fast, secure, privacy-friendly and accessible.

Down at a Glance uses the same NDT7 code as the M-Lab speed test.

The speed test is ad- and cookie-free, data-efficient and highly accessible using standard, no-frills HTML5.

Down at a Glance makes it clear in advance how much data is needed for a speed test. In addition, Down at a Glance has the unique feature that you can specify how long a speed test may take.

Our recommendation

Based on what we know about speed tests, if we had to choose between these two speed tests, we would choose Down at a Glance over M-Lab. In particular, Down at a Glance's high scores in accuracy, data efficiency and speed have a major influence on this choice.